AI App Builder Audits · AI Development Series
Adalo gets a real app into the stores without code. What the app shows and what its backend will answer are two separate questions.
Adalo builds web and native mobile applications with a database included, aimed squarely at people who are not developers. Everything lives on Adalo: there is no code export.
The pattern that matters is the same one that catches people out on every platform of this kind: filtering a list by the logged-in user controls what appears on screen, not what the backend is willing to return.
Adalo exposes a REST API over your collections. If that API is enabled and not properly restricted, the app's screen filters become irrelevant — anyone with the endpoint can ask for records directly.
These recur in Adalo applications.
Screens are filtered to the current user, so the app behaves correctly. The collection itself frequently permits far more than the app ever asks for.
Anything that queries the collection directly — the API, another screen, a modified client — gets whatever the collection allows rather than whatever the screen intended.
What it costs you: records reachable outside the interface that was meant to restrict them.On mobile, the app is installed on the user's device and its network traffic can be observed. Records fetched for a screen arrive in full, including fields the screen never shows.
Internal notes, other users' contact details and status flags all travel with the records they are attached to.
What it costs you: fields exposed that were never meant to leave the database.Adalo lists fetch and filter in a way that is comfortable at hundreds of records and noticeably slow at tens of thousands. There is limited ability to add indexes or restructure queries.
The app that felt instant during testing becomes the app users complain about, and there is not much you can do inside the platform about it.
What it costs you: an app that gets worse as it gets more successful.Adalo does something genuinely difficult: it gets a non-developer to a real, installable mobile app with a working database behind it. For a lot of small operational apps that is exactly the right amount of tool.
The honest summary: Adalo is a reasonable choice for a small app with modest data, and the two things that will eventually bite are the same two on every closed platform: what the backend permits regardless of the screens, and what you would do if you had to leave.
It controls what people see in the app, which is not the same as what the backend will return. If the collection permits broader access, or the API is enabled without proper restriction, the filter is doing presentation rather than protection. That gap is the most common serious finding on platforms of this kind.
You would be rebuilding, because there is no code to take with you. Your data can be exported, which is the important part, but the application itself does not come. That is a normal trade for this class of product rather than a criticism — it just means it is worth knowing how much of your operation depends on it before that decision is forced.
No, and we would rather say so plainly than pretend otherwise. We build with Claude Code and Cursor, with senior developers designing the system, reviewing every change and testing it. What makes us useful here is not Adalo expertise, it is that the thing being audited is a data model, a permission scheme and an API.
We audit what these tools produce, whichever one you used.
Tell us roughly what you built and how many people use it. If an audit is not the right thing for you, we will say so.
What the report covers:
We reply within one working day.